<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jetplane Journal &#187; iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jetplanejournal.com/category/ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jetplanejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tech opinions, reviews and how-to&#039;s. No Jetplanes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Content creation apps: Make your users look good</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/content-creation-apps-make-your-users-look-good/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/content-creation-apps-make-your-users-look-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[designing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/?p=2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The latest star on the App Store is Paper, a drawing and sketching app that has been getting lots of praise recently. Apart from the lovely UI and hipsterific moleskine imagery, I was wondering how this particular app had managed to garner so much more attention than other similar apps. Penultimate and others offer similar [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest star on the App Store is <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/paper-by-fiftythree/id506003812?mt=8" title="Paper on the App Store">Paper</a>, a drawing and sketching app that has been getting lots of praise recently.</p>
<p>Apart from the lovely UI and hipsterific moleskine imagery, I was wondering how this particular app had managed to garner so much more attention than other similar apps. <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/penultimate/id354098826?mt=8" title="Penultimate on the App Store">Penultimate</a> and others offer similar features (and have done well), but didn&#8217;t get the same amount of buzz.</p>
<p>I think the secret is that the default pen that is preselected in Paper makes a typical user&#8217;s horrible tablet &#8216;strokes&#8217; look stylish and slick. Try it! Scribble a note in one of the other drawing apps and then write the same note in Paper: in most apps my notes look like my handwriting – horrible. In Paper my notes actually look fairly decent and even have a vague hint of calligraphy. </p>
<p><strong>Penultimate:</strong><br />
<a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0048.png"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0048-400x300.png" alt="" title="IMG_0048" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2076" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Paper:</strong><br />
<a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0047.png"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/IMG_0047-400x300.png" alt="" title="IMG_0047" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2075" /></a></p>
<p>Writing in Penultimate is certainly not terrible, and you could even argue it&#8217;s slightly more legible, but Paper&#8217;s default presentation feels more &#8220;artsy&#8221; in a good way. Paper also has a few other tricks up its sleeve (free to get started, innovative &#8216;undo&#8217; gesture and customizable moleskine-esque notebooks) that probably contributed to its success, but the results you can achieve with the free drawing tools are certainly a good way to hook users in.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the same principle you&#8217;ll find in Apple&#8217;s iLife and iWork apps: there are alternatives out there that give you more freedom to express your own creativity and style, but in the hands of untrained users, the results are disappointing. But it&#8217;s easy to create a slick trailer in iMovie or a nice presentation with Keynote, without having to go through a steep learning curve.</p>
<p>So if your app is designed for content creation, it&#8217;s probably a good idea to make sure that even untrained users can achieve great looking results on their first go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/content-creation-apps-make-your-users-look-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Eye-Fi Pro &#124; X2</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-eye-fi-pro-x2/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-eye-fi-pro-x2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 22:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geotagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sd card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/?p=2017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What&#8217;s the most annoying part of digital photography? That&#8217;s right, fiddling around with the memory card or USB cable to copy your photos to your computer. Well the Eye-Fi cards promise to have a better solution for copying photos: these cards can transfer your digital snaps wirelessly. Yep &#8211; despite being the same size as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the most annoying part of digital photography? That&#8217;s right, fiddling around with the memory card or USB cable to copy your photos to your computer.</p>
<p>Well the Eye-Fi cards promise to have a better solution for copying photos: these cards can transfer your digital snaps wirelessly. Yep &#8211; despite being the same size as a normal SD card, an Eye-Fi card can connect to your computer over a wifi network. Let&#8217;s take a closer look at the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI/?tag=whitjetp-20" title="Eye-Fi Pro | X2 at Amazon.com" target="_blank">Eye-Fi Pro | X2</a> &#8211; their latest and greatest.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P9205143.jpg"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P9205143-400x300.jpg" alt="" title="Eye-Fi card with Panasonic Lumix GF-1" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2026" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P92051411.jpg"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P92051411-320x300.jpg" alt="" title="Eye-Fi card closeup" width="320" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2025" /></a></p>
<h1>Getting started</h1>
<p>You need to download special Eye-Fi software for the initial setup. You connect your Eye-Fi card to the supplied USB adapter and configure it to connect to your existing wireless network, or you can either have it create its own ad-hoc network for when you&#8217;re on the move.</p>
<p>Then, just pop the card into your camera and away you go.</p>
<h1>How to use the Eye-Fi card</h1>
<p>The Eye-Fi card works just like any other fast SD card. Pop it in your camera, take pictures (RAW or JPEG or both) and movies – that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p>Once your camera has been on a few seconds, the Eye-Fi card will power up its wireless feature and look for your existing network. Once connected, the special Eye-Fi software on your computer will copy the photos over the air onto your PC or Mac.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t got a wireless network nearby, the card can alternatively create its own wireless network. You connect to this network (named something like &#8220;Eye-Fi 132456&#8243;) and then the copying magic starts.</p>
<h1>Performance</h1>
<p>Despite having pretty impressive wireless performance, it will take a bit longer to copy the huge files produced by today&#8217;s modern cameras over wifi than it would over a USB card reader. However, you can optionally choose to only copy your JPEG images, leaving your RAW copies on the card ready to by copied over USB later.</p>
<p>The software is an Adobe Air app, so it isn&#8217;t the best Mac app I&#8217;ve ever seen, but overall it isn&#8217;t too bad. Once you have your card configured, you won&#8217;t need to use it too much anyway. Kudos to Eye-Fi for having a cross-platform solution for us Mac users that works.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Eye-Fi-Center-5.png"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Eye-Fi-Center-5-387x300.png" alt="" title="Eye-Fi Center 5" width="387" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2029" /></a></p>
<h1>Other handy tricks</h1>
<h3>Geotagging</h3>
<p>Certain Eye-Fi cards can also make use of the wireless chip inside to geo-tag your photos. They do this by looking at nearby wifi networks. These are later matched by the Eye-Fi software to a database that knows the geographical location of tonnes of wifi networks around the world and uses that to give your photos a rough geographical location.<br />
It&#8217;s not perfect, but it&#8217;s usually good enough to help you figure out which side of town you took a particular photo.</p>
<h3>Endless Memory</h3>
<p>Need to take a ton of pictures? No problem! If you&#8217;re on a wifi network, your Eye-Fi card will shove pics over to your computer and free up storage for new pictures, which means you&#8217;ll never run out of storage. This is only useful for certain scenarios, but if you need to take a lot of pictures and don&#8217;t want to have to switch cards it might come in useful.</p>
<h3>Picture uploads</h3>
<p>I didn&#8217;t test this feature, but Eye-Fi also offers an online storage and sync option, that allows you to share pictures with friends or between devices.</p>
<h3>iPad app</h3>
<p>One other great feature is the fact that you can use the Eye-Fi card with the free companion iPad app, allowing you to use your iPad as a giant photo preview screen: snap a shot, wait 2 seconds and it shows up on the iPad. I used this feature to turn my iPad and a camera with an Eye-Fi card into a <a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/diy-ipad-wedding-photobooth/">rudimentary homemade wedding photo booth</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P9205145.jpg"><img src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/P9205145-400x300.jpg" alt="" title="Eye-Fi with iPad app" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-2027" /></a></p>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>If you just need to grab a few photos quickly, the Eye-Fi a great solution. I could see it being particularly useful in scenarios where you&#8217;re frequently taking a small number of shots and need to quickly preview them on a larger screen.</p>
<p>The geo-tagging feature is also quite nice and a good alternative to using geo-tagged iPhone pictures as a reference.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI/?tag=whitjetp-20" title="Eye-Fi Pro X2 at Amazon.com" target="_blank">Eye-Fi Pro | X2</a> does exactly what it claims. The wireless performance is pretty good and it can be a huge timesaver if you often need to preview your pictures in between shots.</p>
<p><strong>Recommended</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-eye-fi-pro-x2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Waterfield Cargo bag</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-waterfield-cargo-bag/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-waterfield-cargo-bag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Sep 2011 15:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[macbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/?p=2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve been on the lookout for a new laptop bag for a while. I was recently given a new MacBook Air for work and as my old bag was starting to fall apart and I often cycle to work, I needed something a bit more rugged than most typical commuter bags. Waterfield bags are designed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve been on the lookout for a new laptop bag for a while. I was recently given a new MacBook Air for work and as my old bag was starting to fall apart and I  often cycle to work, I needed something a bit more rugged than most typical commuter bags.</p>
<p>Waterfield bags are designed to be very tough (not surprising as the company was founded by a former bicycle messenger), so I was keen to take a closer look at the <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/cargo/cargo.htm">Waterfield Cargo</a> bag.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-1.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-543" title="waterfield cargo 1" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-1.jpg" alt="" width="442" height="295" /></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="features">Features</h2>
<p>The Waterfield Cargo looks like fairly typical messenger-style bag at first. It has a shoulder strap, front flap and a buckle. But there are ton of nifty design touches that make the bag very practical in everyday use:</p>
<ul>
<li>The top zip makes it easy to get stuff from the main compartment without lifting up the main flap</li>
<li>The interior fabric is a bright colour, that makes it easy to find things inside</li>
<li>The back pocket is great for your iPad or a folder with papers</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-2.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-544" title="waterfield cargo 2" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-2-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-4.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-546" title="waterfield cargo 4" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-4-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-6.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-548" title="waterfield cargo 6" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-6-300x200.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="200" /></a></p>
<h2>Design</h2>
<p>This bag looks pretty good, but the design isn&#8217;t the main reason you&#8217;d buy this bag. It’s a very functional design and it’s“tidy” enough to take into any office, without looking too corporate.</p>
<p>You can also customise the look quite a bit by choosing various trim and colour options.</p>
<h2 id="quality_and_durability">Quality and Durability</h2>
<p>Waterfield state that the bag was inspired by ruggedized bike messenger accessories and it certainly feels every bit as durable as its heritage.&nbsp;The nylon fabric is extremely tough and feels much more durable than the fabrics used on similar products from other well-known manufacturer’s bags I’ve owned.</p>
<p>This is how much I can easily fit in the Waterfield Cargo:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<div id="attachment_552" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 452px"><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-10.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-552   " title="Contents of my bag" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-10.jpg" alt="" width="442" height="332" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Contents of my bag</p></div>
<p>As I mentioned at the outset, I plan on commuting by bike quite a bit with this bag, so I want something that can be strapped to the back of a bike rack and withstand a bit of wear and tear. So far, the Waterfield Cargo has been more than up to the challenge: Despite being bumped around on the back of a bike for several weeks, kicked around on the floor of the subway and dragged halfway across Malaysia on my honeymoon, it still looks like new. Any dirt or muck you get on the bag easily brushes off, and all the seams and zips are rock solid.</p>
<h2 id="bonus_round">Bonus Round</h2>
<p>There’s a lot to like about this bag, but here are a few extra tidbits I particularly like:</p>
<ul>
<li>The strap can easily being adjusted just by lifting an adjustment flap at the side, but it doesn’t accidently lift or slip</li>
<li>Underneath the front flap are two slim pockets that are almost hidden – perfect for storing your passport or other valuables somewhere hard to access while travelling.</li>
<li>The interior pockets don’t get in your way, so you can use the space inside the bag to the fullest.</li>
<li>If you do need extra compartments, the <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/sleevecases/sleevecases.php">Sleevecase</a> accessory is perfect for documents and laptops (it has two compartments, perfect for a MacBook and iPad), while the <a href="http://www.sfbags.com/products/cableguy/cableguy.htm">Cablepouch</a> is great for all your accessories and cables:</li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-7.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-549" title="waterfield cargo 7" src="http://www.mac-forums.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/waterfield-cargo-7.jpg" alt="" width="517" height="345" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 id="conclusion">Conclusion</h2>
<p>At $189, the Waterfield Cargo is certainly one of the more expensive laptop bags out there. But this Waterfield bag, which was handmade in San Francisco, is extremely well made with high-quality materials used throughout, so I’d argue that the price is more than justified. If you&#8217;ve got a MacBook Pro or MacBook Air you&#8217;re carrying around, it&#8217;s worth investing in a good bag to protect it.</p>
<p>Unlike other messenger bags that I’ve owned, that have all started to fall apart at the seams after a few months of owning them, this bag feels as though it will give me a good few years of use.</p>
<p>The attention to detail and everyday practicality is very obvious — someone really thought about every aspect of this bag while designing it – and it is very versatile, equally useful as a travel bag for longer journeys or as a daily bag for the office.</p>
<p>Overall, <strong>highly recommended</strong>.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/review-waterfield-cargo-bag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DIY iPad Wedding Photobooth</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/diy-ipad-wedding-photobooth/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/diy-ipad-wedding-photobooth/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 14:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dslr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eye fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[olympus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panasonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photo booth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photobooth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remote shutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wedding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/?p=1940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When we were planning our wedding, we saw lots of wedding photo booth ideas. You can either rent a traditional photo booth, or there are various DIY setups involving digital cameras. I started thinking and thought it would be cool to have a setup that would allow people to see their snaps rights away, without [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When we were planning our wedding, we saw lots of wedding photo booth ideas. You can either rent a traditional photo booth, or there are various DIY setups involving digital cameras.</p>
<p>I started thinking and thought it would be cool to have a setup that would allow people to see their snaps rights away, without having to go around to the camera itself. With a DSLR that supports remote control from a laptop, that is fairly easy to set up, but as it turned out, my cameras don&#8217;t support remote control over USB. So I started looking into alternatives and soon hit on the idea of using an <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI/?tag=whitjetp-20">EyeFi card</a> and my iPad. (A few weeks after I started planning our photo booth, a <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2011/06/12/diy-ipad-photo-booth-captures-the-moments-you-might-be-too-drunk/">story popped up on Engadget</a> about a similar, albeit more professional, setup.)</p>
<h2>What you&#8217;ll need</h2>
<ul>
<li>A digital camera with remote shutter release (I used the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-DMC-GF3-Interchangeable-Digital-Touchscreen/dp/B0054YVA8S/?tag=whitjetp-20">Panasonic GF-1</a> with a cheap wireless remote shutter release from eBay)</li>
<li>An <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Eye-Fi-Class-Wireless-Memory-EYE-FI-8PC/dp/B002UT42UI/?tag=whitjetp-20">EyeFi SD card</a> in the camera (make sure it&#8217;s a newer <a href="http://www.eye.fi/products/compare-cards">EyeFi card</a> with support for &#8220;direct mode&#8221;)</li>
<li>An <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MC979LL-Tablet-White-NEWEST/dp/B0047DVWLW/?tag=whitjetp-20">iPad</a> connected to the EyeFi network running the free <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/eye-fi/id306011124?mt=8">EyeFi app</a></li>
<li>A tall tripod</li>
<li>A table or stand of some kind for the iPad</li>
<li>(optional) A frame, backdrop or props of some kind for guests to pose with</li>
</ul>
<div>
<div id="attachment_1953" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 342px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/P8215078.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1953" title="Equipment" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/P8215078-332x300.jpg" alt="" width="332" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Camera, remote shutter, iPad and EyeFi card</p></div>
</div>
<div>With this setup, guests could take a snapshot using the remote shutter and almost instantly see it on the iPad a few seconds later. To speed up the wireless transfers, I configured the EyeFi card to wirelessly transfer the JPEGs only, whilst keeping the large RAW files on the card. This also allowed us to place the camera somewhere out of the way and still gave the guests a way to view their pictures.</div>
<div id="attachment_1943" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 461px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/DSC_0887.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1943" title="Photo booth setup" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/DSC_0887-451x300.jpg" alt="" width="451" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The photo booth setup – the iPad is just off to the side on a table</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1943" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 425px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Me-portrait-1030971.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1944" title="Me portrait-1030971" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/Me-portrait-1030971-415x300.jpg" alt="" width="415" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">One of the snaps from the photo booth</p></div>
<h2>Other Tips</h2>
<div>
<ul>
<li>Turn on face recognition if your camera supports it and make sure the autofocus is correctly detecting your guests.</li>
<li>Turn off any power saving options on the camera and iPad.</li>
<li>If your setup is indoors, connect the iPad and camera to AC adapters, if possible.</li>
<li>You&#8217;ll need a fairly tall tripod or something to stand it on to get the camera up high enough. Ours was a bit low so I ended up adjusting the perspective using Adobe Lightroom.</li>
<li>Explain the setup to someone beforehand and ask them to keep an eye on things to make sure everything runs smoothly.</li>
</ul>
<div>Our guests had a lot of fun with our DIY photobooth and I love the way the pictures turned out, highly recommended!</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/diy-ipad-wedding-photobooth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Review: Dodocase for iPad 2</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/dodocase-for-ipad-2/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/dodocase-for-ipad-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 May 2011 05:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dodocase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 2 case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[magnets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smart cover]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/dodocase-for-ipad-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The first accessory every iPad 2 owner buys is one of Apple&#8217;s Smart Covers. But as elegant as the Smart Covers are, they do not offer much in the way of protection and my iPad already has a number of alarmingly deep scratches on the back from being in my bag with my keys and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first accessory every iPad 2 owner buys is one of Apple&#8217;s Smart Covers. But as elegant as the Smart Covers are, they do not offer much in the way of protection and my iPad already has a number of alarmingly deep scratches on the back from being in my bag with my keys and camera.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293756.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1844" title="DodoCase" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293756-640x480.jpg" alt="" width="448" height="336" /></a></p>
<p>Enter the Dodocase for iPad 2 – a hand-made, book-like case with an elegant wooden frame. The DodoCase has a moleskine-like design and elegantly encloses your entire iPad like a hardback book. On the right side of the book sits a wooden frame that has special cutouts for the iPad, while the left has a trademark ownership label and customiseable colour  lining.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293759.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1847" title="Owner label" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293759-640x480.jpg" alt="" width="384" height="288" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-1842"></span></p>
<h1>Likes</h1>
<p><strong>Protection</strong><br />
The DodoCase is great for toting your iPad around inside any old bag and you don&#8217;t have to worry about the Smart Cover sliding off and it getting scratched or dented. </span></p>
<p><strong>Look and feel</strong><br />
The case itself looks great and it&#8217;s quite nice to carry around. It&#8217;s fairly easy to get the iPad in and out of the DodoCase, with squishy corner fasteners making sure that it stays firmly in place. The wooden frame has cutouts that allow access to the connection ports and right-hand controls and an elastic band ensures the lid stays firmly shut. It&#8217;s also comfortable to use your iPad while it&#8217;s in the case (particularly in landscape mode), but it&#8217;s also fairly easy to take it out if you need to.</p>
<p><strong>Weight</strong><br />
The bamboo used to construct the DodoCase is really light, so despite its considerable size (see below), it doesn&#8217;t add much weight to the iPad at all. Since I usually take my iPad with me when I want to avoid lugging a heavy laptop, this was quite important to me.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293758.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1846" title="DodoCase frame" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293758-640x853.jpg" alt="" width="384" height="512" /></a></p>
<h1>Dislikes</h1>
<p><strong>Magnets<br />
</strong><br />
I&#8217;ll start with a big one: no magnets. The DodoCase for iPad 2 does not support the iPad&#8217;s sleep/wake if cover is opened feature, which is quite disappointing for a case that isn&#8217;t exactly cheap. You can however jerryrig your own solution by sticking a slim fridge magnet in the right spot of the cover, but I would have assumed that  wake-on-open support would be a no-brainer for this type of product. The FAQ on the DodoCase website seems to hint that future versions of the DodoCase will have magnet support though, so it may be worth checking back in the near future.</p>
<p><strong>Stand</strong><br />
If you flip the cover over, the case will also prop your iPad up a bit, giving you a better angle for typing. However the Smart Cover has a slightly higher angle. You can also stand the DodoCase upright , but unless you have a sufficiently grippy surface, the whole affair is a bit wobbly – the Smart Cover wins again here.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-weight: normal; font-size: 13px;"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293768.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1855" title="DodoCase as stand for tizi" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293768-640x480.jpg" alt="" width="384" height="288" /></a><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong>Size</strong><br />
While the DodoCase does add quite a bit of protection for your iPad, it does feel unnecessarily large, compared to the thin and sleek design of the iPad 2. The case is roughly 2,2cm thick when closed, which is 2,5x thicker than the iPad. When the iPad is inside the case, there looks to be a bit of space between the back of the iPad and the case, which seems unnecessary.</span></p>
<h1>Conclusion</h1>
<p>The DodoCase for iPad 2 is a great-looking case that is really well made. If you mainly plan on using your iPad around the house, I would probably stick with the Smart Cover, simply because it is more convenient. But if you plan on taking your iPad out a lot, the DodoCase is a great and stylish alternative to getting a bag with a laptop pouch.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293770.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1856" title="Reading with DodoCase" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293770-400x300.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293776.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1862" title="DodoCase vs. Smart Cover" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293776-400x300.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293763.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1850" title="iPad 2 in DodoCase" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293763-400x300.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293767.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1854" title="DodoCase folded" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/P5293767-400x300.jpg" alt="" width="400" height="300" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/dodocase-for-ipad-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Open iPad GarageBand files on your Mac – a workaround</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/open-ipad-garageband-files-on-your-mac-a-workaround/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/open-ipad-garageband-files-on-your-mac-a-workaround/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2011 23:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[garageband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipad 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workaround]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jetplanejournal.com/?p=1816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Update: That didn&#8217;t take long! Apple has just released an update for GarageBand on the Mac that officially adds support for iPad projects. It&#8217;s 181MB and seems to include add all the software instruments found in the iPad version that were missing &#160; So ignore the workaround below, update GarageBand and you&#8217;ll be all set. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Update</strong>: That didn&#8217;t take long! Apple has just released an <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/dl1345">update for GarageBand on the Mac</a> that officially adds support for iPad projects. It&#8217;s 181MB and seems to include add all the software instruments found in the iPad version that were missing</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-updater.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1834" title="GarageBand updater" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-updater-640x331.png" alt="" width="640" height="331" /></a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>So ignore the workaround below, update GarageBand and you&#8217;ll be all set.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span id="more-1816"></span><br />
At the time of writing (March 2011), the Mac version of GarageBand can&#8217;t open files created with the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Apple-MC769LL-Tablet-Black-NEWEST/dp/B0013FRNKG/">iPad</a> version. Instead, you&#8217;ll get an error message and the file won&#8217;t open. This is presumably because the iPad version has some features, instruments and loops not yet available in the Mac version.</p>
<p>Apple has <a href="http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4574">promised an update</a>, but for the time being, I&#8217;ve found this workaround.</p>
<p>Before you  try this, let me stress that it&#8217;s a workaround with issues: your files won&#8217;t open perfectly, but at least you&#8217;ll be able to get some of your project onto your Mac. However, please do make sure you make a copy of your project file first.</p>
<div id="attachment_1823" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-song-ipad.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-1823" title="GarageBand song ipad" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-song-ipad-640x480.png" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">The project on my iPad</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1818" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-error-before.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1818" title="GarageBand error before" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand-error-before.png" alt="" width="500" height="236" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Can&#39;t be opened on a Mac</p></div>
<p style="text-align: left;">First, copy the project file onto your Mac with iTunes. Then, right-click the project file and choose &#8220;show Package contents&#8221;. Find the &#8220;<em>projectdata</em>&#8221; file and open it, preferably with the Plist Editor, but a plain-text editor should work as well in a pinch.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/projectData-file.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1819" title="projectData file" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/projectData-file-640x389.png" alt="" width="640" height="389" /></a>Look a the &#8220;<em>version</em>&#8221; key with the value &#8220;<em>45000</em>&#8221; under &#8220;<em>$top</em>&#8220;.  Change that value to &#8220;<em>40000</em>&#8221; and save the file.</p>
<p><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/edit-the-version-number.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1820" title="edit the version number" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/edit-the-version-number-640x228.png" alt="" width="640" height="228" /></a></p>
<p>Now, when you open it with GarageBand, you&#8217;ll receive a warning (as opposed to the earlier &#8216;error&#8217; message), but you should be able to open the file, albeit with some errors and warnings.</p>
<div id="attachment_1821" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 510px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-1821" title="GarageBand warning" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/GarageBand.png" alt="" width="500" height="239" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Just ignore the warnings</p></div>
<div id="attachment_1822" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 650px"><a href="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/success.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-1822" title="success!" src="http://jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/success-640x415.png" alt="" width="640" height="415" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Success</p></div>
<p><strong>Note: </strong>There&#8217;s a reason Apple changed the version number and you&#8217;ll find a lot of things won&#8217;t work (e.g. certain Apple Loops and instruments will be missing &#8211; note the empty drum track in my screenshot). But if you just want to get the basic project information and the bits you played off your iPad onto your Mac, it&#8217;s worth a shot.</p>
<p>Presumably Apple will soon be releasing an update for GarageBand on the Mac, so hopefully this hacky workaround won&#8217;t be necessary much longer. If you&#8217;re reading this long after March 2011, make sure you have all GarageBand updates first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/open-ipad-garageband-files-on-your-mac-a-workaround/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Three things on the iPad that feel rushed</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/3-things-on-the-ipad-that-feel-rushed/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/3-things-on-the-ipad-that-feel-rushed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 17:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gripes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ical]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=1322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most people would agree that the iPad is a fantastic 1.0 device. This is of course partly due to the shared iPhone OS heritage, but the overall experience is nonetheless is extremely well-rounded and polished. But there are a few areas that feel a bit crummy, when compared with the rest of the experience. Considering [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people would agree that the iPad is a fantastic 1.0 device. This is of course partly due to the shared iPhone OS heritage, but the overall experience is nonetheless is extremely well-rounded and polished.</p>
<p>But there are a few areas that feel a bit crummy, when compared with the rest of the experience. Considering how many apps Apple had to completely overhaul for the iPad&#8217;s presentation in January, it&#8217;s no surprise to find a few rough edges, on the otherwise fantastic device.</p>
<h2>File syncing</h2>
<p>I understand why Apple is hesitant to add any kind of file system to the iPhone OS, but considering how much emphasis was placed on the iPad apps at launch, you would think that they would have come up with an elegant way to get documents on and off your iPad.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, in reality it&#8217;s a huge pain. <a href="http://www.macobserver.com/tmo/article/file_sharing_with_an_ipad_ugh/">Ted Landau took the time to document</a> all the steps it takes to actually get a document into iWork on your iPad, none of which are particularly intuitive. Plus you then have the hassle of managing revisions and tracking multiple copies of the same file.</p>
<p>The iPhone app <a href="http://simplenoteapp.com">SimpleNote</a> and <a href="http://notational.net/">Notational Velocity</a> on the mac show how document sync can be done right. Some apps are also adding <a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?s=dropbox&amp;x=0&amp;y=0">Dropbox support</a>, which gives you an idea how file sync in general could be improved. Given the fact that Apple has already done a lot of the hard work by creating the <a href="http://www.amazon.com/MobileMe-Individual-Updated-2009-Version/dp/B001AMLRU4/">MobileMe</a> and iWork online services, one can only hope that we&#8217;ll see seamless, cloud-based file syncing added sooner rather than later.</p>
<h2>Safari caching</h2>
<p>If you open multiple tabs in safari on your Mac, switching between them is instantaneous. In mobile safari, you can never be sure whether the tab will open immediately, or whether it will need to be reloaded over your wifi or 3G connection. On the wifi-only iPad, where users can&#8217;t be sure they&#8217;ll always have access to an internet connection, webpage persistance is particularly an issue. The fact that <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/artist/codium-labs-llc/id334194708">Offline Pages</a> (iTunes link) is currently one of the top free iPad apps in the App Store would seem to underline this point.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Mobilesafari-cache.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1338" title="Mobilesafari cache" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/Mobilesafari-cache-640x480.png" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></a></p>
<p>Mobile Safari&#8217;s limiting caching abilities are most likely due to the limited amount of RAM in the iPad, which has just 256MB, however as <a href="http://rentzsch.tumblr.com/post/382362022/persistent-mobilesafari-pages">Rentzsch has pointed out</a>, it should be possible to offload pages to the solid state drive as a workaround, although it&#8217;s not a trivial problem.</p>
<h2>Calendar event creation</h2>
<p>Making event creation in calendars difficult seems to be one of Apple&#8217;s <a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/ical-3-%E2%80%93%C2%A0bubbles-and-bewilderment">favorite UI slip-ups</a>. The calendar app on the iPad is gorgeously designed and it makes browsing through calendar entries a visual pleasure.</p>
<p>But the interface for adding entries seems to have been cut &amp; paste directly from the iPhone version and doesn&#8217;t make any use of the additional screen real estate the iPad offers. You get the impression the designers spent all their time working on the rest of the UI and simply stuck the editing controls in there at the last minute.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/iPhone-iPad-cal.png"><img class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1335" title="iPhone iPad cal" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/iPhone-iPad-cal-640x357.png" alt="" width="640" height="357" /></a></p>
<p>Consistency between the two platforms is of course a good thing, provided it doesn&#8217;t slow the user down unnecessarily. I would argue that you could better use the iPad&#8217;s screen real estate to make a much more efficient and intuitive event creation UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/3-things-on-the-ipad-that-feel-rushed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPad Fatigue</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/ipad-fatigue/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/ipad-fatigue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fatigue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netbooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=1295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the ways you can measure the impact a device has, is by how frequently it&#8217;s used. A netbook, for example, might look like great device on paper, but a lot of early adopters seem to have switched back to using a full-sized notebook, whilst their netbooks collect dust. The problem is feature overlap: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the ways you can measure the impact a device has, is by how frequently it&#8217;s used. A netbook, for example, might look like great device on paper, but a lot of early adopters seem to have switched back to using a full-sized notebook, whilst their netbooks collect dust.</p>
<p>The problem is feature overlap: if a netbook can do some, but not all of the same things a notebook can do &#8211; why not just take the notebook? You&#8217;ll need a bag to carry either, so there&#8217;s only a slight difference in size and weight to consider. Smartphones on the other hand can do some of the same things a notebook can do, but have a clear size and weight advantage, as well as a telephony features that a notebook doesn&#8217;t offer. </p>
<p>The iPad might suffer from the same problem as netbooks. It offers a lot of features offered by both other device categories, but it also presents these features in a new, multi-touch interface. But is the new interface and compact form factor enough to convince users to ditch their smartphones and notebooks for certain tasks?</p>
<p>Browsing some of the initial comments about the iPad, most users are initially very enthusiastic, as you would expect with most highly anticipated new CE devices. However, some users are already reporting that the initial excitement has worn off:</p>
<p>Jeff Jarvis <a href="http://twitter.com/jeffjarvis/statuses/11586477852">tweets</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;After having slept with her (Ms. iPad), I am having morning-after regrets. Sweet and cute but shallow and vapid.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>Update: </strong>Turns out Jeff is actually <a href="http://www.buzzmachine.com/2010/04/10/reboxing/">returning his iPad</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>[...] &#8220;(I) simply don’t see a good use for the machine and don’t want to spend $500 on something I’m not going to use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Funemployed entrepreneur <a href="http://nat.org">Nat Friedman</a> posts on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?v=wall&amp;story_fbid=114433028573902&amp;id=547946582&amp;ref=mf">Facebook</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;24 hours later, I must admit I&#8217;m not sure what I&#8217;m supposed to be using this thing for. The charm is wearing off.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On a more anecdotal note, I recently had a few friends over for a party and they were playing with an iPad borrowed from work. Most of them were fascinated by the device and wanted one, but couldn&#8217;t really see much use for it apart as a &#8220;toy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Unlike the iPhone, which you always carry with you anyway, the iPad is something you need to actively seek out and use. With many people purchasing iPads without a clear idea what they&#8217;ll be using it for, it&#8217;ll be interesting to see whether Apple&#8217;s latest can win a permanent place in user&#8217;s day-to-day lives, or whether it will be yet another gadget collecting dust somewhere. My guess is that it&#8217;ll be the type of gadget you use regularly – just not as often as your phone or notebook.</p>
<p>What are your thoughts? Are you starting to get bored of your iPad – or has it already become indispensable?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/ipad-fatigue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grassroots UI Innovation</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/grassroots-ui-innovation/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/grassroots-ui-innovation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 22:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UI Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[developers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone OS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=1294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When Apple introduced the iPhone and later the iPhone SDK, they established a series of UI metaphors, interaction models and conventions, that have served as a template for nearly all third party apps. Gestures such as swipe to delete, or UI elements such as springy lists are simply expected. Apple has done such a great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Apple introduced the iPhone and later the iPhone SDK, they established a series of UI metaphors, interaction models and conventions, that have served as a template for nearly all third party apps. Gestures such as swipe to delete, or UI elements such as springy lists are simply expected.</p>
<p>Apple has done such a great job of establishing best practices for nearly all types of UI interactions that it&#8217;s not often you see news kinds of UI interaction introduced by third party developers.</p>
<p>But when <a href="http://www.atebits.com">Atebits</a> introduced <a href="http://www.atebits.com/tweetie-iphone/">Tweetie 2,</a> it also introduced so-called &#8220;spring reloading&#8221;. Basically if you pull down past the end of a list, causing it to spring back, you can refresh the current list of tweets.</p>
<p>Many reviewers noted the ingenuity of this design, as it effectively turned a habit of many users (namely playing with the springy lists) into a useful feature. This design has since been adopted by several other applications and seems as though it may become a de facto UI convention on the iPhone OS. </p>
<p>Here is the original Tweetie 2 design:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/tweetie2.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1303" title="tweetie2" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/tweetie2.png" alt="" width="320" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>Foursquare is basically a straight up copy:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/4sq.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1300" title="4sq" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/4sq.png" alt="" width="320" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>This is Gowalla&#8217;s take on it – the logo appears to let you know you&#8217;ve pulled down far enough:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gowalla.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1302" title="gowalla" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/gowalla.png" alt="" width="320" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>And the Wikipedia app Articles uses the design to lock or unlock your screen orientation:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/articles.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-1301" title="articles" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/articles.png" alt="" width="320" height="316" /></a></p>
<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see if this convention is adopted by more applications going forward – or if Apple will even perhaps add it to their own apps. But at any rate, it&#8217;s nice to see good UI innovations from a third party developer being adopted by others. I can&#8217;t wait to see what Atebits and others come up with for the iPad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/grassroots-ui-innovation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hidden iPad features?</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/hidden-ipad-features/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/hidden-ipad-features/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 19:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[announcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s a lot of speculation at the moment regarding some unanswered iPad questions: Why doesn&#8217;t it seem to have the Weather, Stocks, Clock or Voice Memo apps? Why is there space for a camera? -insert latest techcrunch rumour here- For what it&#8217;s worth, I believe it&#8217;s entirely possible Apple might be holding back certain features [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a class="image-link" href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/202821-ipadcam.jpg"><img class="linked-to-original" src="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/jetplanejournal/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/202821-ipadcam-thumb.jpg" alt="" width="180" height="154" align="right" /></a> There&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/01/27/the-ipad-may-not-have-a-camera-but-its-sdk-thinks-it-does/">lot</a> <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/03/ying">of</a> <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/02/fox-widgets">speculation</a> at the moment regarding some unanswered iPad questions:</p>
<ul>
<li>Why doesn&#8217;t it seem to have the Weather, Stocks, Clock or Voice Memo apps?</li>
<li>Why is there space for a camera?</li>
<li><em>-insert latest techcrunch rumour here-</em></li>
</ul>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, I believe it&#8217;s entirely possible Apple might be holding back certain features so there&#8217;s something new to announce around the time it&#8217;s actually due to ship. In fact, there&#8217;s a precedent for this.</p>
<p>Shortly before the original iPhone was scheduled to launch in 2007, Apple <a href="http://www.tuaw.com/2007/06/18/iphone-delivers-up-to-8-hours-of-talk-time/">announced</a> two major (supposedly last-minute) improvements.</p>
<p>The first was a battery life upgrade (which was probably achieved by software improvements), the second was that they were &#8220;upgrading&#8221; the display to a glass screen &#8211; which seems like such an integral part of the overall device that it would have to have been planned all along.</p>
<p>My guess is that we&#8217;ll see one or two minor iPad announcements in March, but it probably won&#8217;t include a camera.</p>
<p><br class="final-break" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/hidden-ipad-features/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

