<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OS X Bittorrent clients compared &#8211; 2009 Edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/</link>
	<description>Tech opinions, reviews and how-to&#039;s. No Jetplanes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 17:21:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hytch</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4718</link>
		<dc:creator>hytch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 15:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-4718</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been using xtorrent for a couple of years now.  It is a great straight forward program but not sure how it compares to others (I&#039;m a basic user), particularly wit respect to memory usage. I love it because it makes torrent searches ridiculously easy.  Any chance of including this in the 2010 evaluation, or do a quickie now? :)

http://www.xtorrentp2p.com/

Having said that, I will give transmission a try.  Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using xtorrent for a couple of years now.  It is a great straight forward program but not sure how it compares to others (I&#8217;m a basic user), particularly wit respect to memory usage. I love it because it makes torrent searches ridiculously easy.  Any chance of including this in the 2010 evaluation, or do a quickie now? :)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.xtorrentp2p.com/">http://www.xtorrentp2p.com/</a></p>
<p>Having said that, I will give transmission a try.  Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veteran</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4251</link>
		<dc:creator>veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-4251</guid>
		<description>forgot to add - maybe the transmission issues are to do with Snow Leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>forgot to add &#8211; maybe the transmission issues are to do with Snow Leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: veteran</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-4250</link>
		<dc:creator>veteran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-4250</guid>
		<description>Transmission only half supports encryption. It will download and even prefer encrypted clients, but does not encrypt uploads. Also the upload and download speeds in Transmission are very misleading. If for example you set a max download of 50kps, it will say it is running at a constant 50kps, but the actual download, and the network monitor do not support this. uTorrent is still too clunky on OS X. I will also give VUSE a shot, although I am waiting for Deluge 1.2 to be released as a native Mac program.....it is under development!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Transmission only half supports encryption. It will download and even prefer encrypted clients, but does not encrypt uploads. Also the upload and download speeds in Transmission are very misleading. If for example you set a max download of 50kps, it will say it is running at a constant 50kps, but the actual download, and the network monitor do not support this. uTorrent is still too clunky on OS X. I will also give VUSE a shot, although I am waiting for Deluge 1.2 to be released as a native Mac program&#8230;..it is under development!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cellist</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3925</link>
		<dc:creator>cellist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 05:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-3925</guid>
		<description>I find that Transmission constantly hangs on my system. I&#039;d use uTorrent but that doesn&#039;t allow you to move completed torrents to a different folder (yet). Maybe I&#039;ll give VUSE a shot...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that Transmission constantly hangs on my system. I&#8217;d use uTorrent but that doesn&#8217;t allow you to move completed torrents to a different folder (yet). Maybe I&#8217;ll give VUSE a shot&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3837</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-3837</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for this concise and up-to-date review.  This is very helpful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for this concise and up-to-date review.  This is very helpful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3525</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 15:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-3525</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this! Very useful info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this! Very useful info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinRar &#38; Torrent Downloader - Mac-Forums.com</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3496</link>
		<dc:creator>WinRar &#38; Torrent Downloader - Mac-Forums.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:22:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-3496</guid>
		<description>[...] blatant self-promotion to follow* OS X Bittorrent clients compared - 2009 Edition  I just wrote a piece comparing bittorrent clients that you may be interested in.       [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blatant self-promotion to follow* OS X Bittorrent clients compared &#8211; 2009 Edition  I just wrote a piece comparing bittorrent clients that you may be interested in.       [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/os-x-bittorrent-clients-compared-2009-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 19:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=562#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>Nice roundup! 
I myself am using Ubuntu and despite there are other Linux solutions, I prefer uTorrent. 
It works perfect under Wine. A lightweight and fast Bittorrent client, I like it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice roundup!<br />
I myself am using Ubuntu and despite there are other Linux solutions, I prefer uTorrent.<br />
It works perfect under Wine. A lightweight and fast Bittorrent client, I like it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
