<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jetplane Journal &#187; downloads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jetplanejournal.com/tag/downloads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jetplanejournal.com</link>
	<description>Tech opinions, reviews and how-to&#039;s. No Jetplanes.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:49:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
		<item>
		<title>JetLinked: Installing applications on the Mac still broken</title>
		<link>http://jetplanejournal.com/jetlinked-installing-applications-on-the-mac-still-broken/</link>
		<comments>http://jetplanejournal.com/jetlinked-installing-applications-on-the-mac-still-broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 07:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[JetLinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distribution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[os x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zip]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jetplanejournal.com/?p=963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lukas Mathis has posted some thoughts on the issues Mac newcomers have with .dmg files. I also talked about this issue a while back in a post on the most common issues switchers have, but it&#8217;s worth noting it again. I agree with his followup post that adding another file format isn&#8217;t really the way [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lukas Mathis <a href="http://ignorethecode.net/blog/2009/07/24/installing-applications-on-the-mac-still-broken/">has posted some thoughts</a> on the issues Mac newcomers have with .dmg files. I also talked about this issue a while back in <a href="http://www.jetplanejournal.com/three-os-x-quirks-that-confuse-the-hell-out-of-switchers">a post on the most common issues switchers have</a>, but it&#8217;s worth noting it again. I agree with his <a href="http://ignorethecode.net/blog/2009/07/25/more-on-installing-applications/">followup post</a> that adding another file format isn&#8217;t really the way to go either –   DMG files are a great feature to have – once you&#8217;ve understood them. But from a usability and customer support perspective, a simple zip file seems to be the better choice.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d still be interested to see what kinds of customer support issues you run into with zip files though:</p>
<ul>
<li>Do people using alternative browsers, that don&#8217;t automatically open &#8220;safe&#8221; files like Safari does, struggle with them?</li>
<li>Do users who prefer to manually download updates have several versions of the same app sitting in their Downloads folder?</li>
<li>Are there any issues if users have a 3rd party archive tool installed (I&#8217;m looking at you StuffIt)?</li>
</ul>
<p>But despite those questions, I think there is a valid reason to reconsider whether .dmg files should still be considered &#8220;best practise&#8221; for app distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://jetplanejournal.com/jetlinked-installing-applications-on-the-mac-still-broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

